Healed Education

Unveiling Bowlby’s Theory: The Science Behind a Baby’s Love for Mom

Bowlby’s Theory of Attachment: Understanding the Emotional Bond Between Babies and Their CaregiversHave you ever wondered why newborns seem so emotionally connected to their mothers? Why do they cry and seek comfort from their primary caregivers?

British psychologist John Bowlby provided fascinating insights into these questions with his Theory of Attachment. In this article, we will explore Bowlby’s theory and its four stages of attachment, as well as the strengths and impact of this theory.

Bowlby’s Theory of Attachment

Bowlby’s Theory of Attachment revolves around the idea that infants are biologically driven to form an emotional bond with their mothers. This bond, known as attachment, plays a crucial role in the child’s development and future relationships.

The biologically driven propensity to form an emotional bond with the mother

From the moment they are born, babies are hardwired to seek out and form a connection with their mothers. This instinctual behavior is vital for their survival, as newborns are completely dependent on their caregivers for nourishment, protection, and emotional support.

Through a process known as “imprinting,” infants become emotionally connected to their mothers and show a strong preference for them. This early attachment provides a secure base from which the child can explore the world.

Four stages of attachment

Bowlby identified four distinct stages of attachment that infants go through as they develop their emotional bond with their caregivers. 1.

Pre-attachment: This initial stage occurs from birth to around three months. During this time, infants have not yet developed a specific attachment to one person.

They display social behaviors, such as smiling and cooing, indiscriminately towards anyone who provides care and comfort. 2.

Attachment in Making: Between three to six months, infants start to show a preference for familiar faces, particularly their primary caregivers. They become more responsive to their mother’s voice, touch, and facial expressions.

However, they still do not display distress when separated from their caregivers. 3.

Clear-cut Attachment: Around six months to two years, infants enter the clear-cut attachment stage. They actively seek proximity to their caregivers and experience separation anxiety when apart.

They rely on their primary caregivers for comfort and protection, signaling their emotional bond. 4.

Formation of Reciprocal Relationships: From two years onwards, children start to develop a more reciprocal and interactive relationship with their caregivers. They are capable of understanding and responding to their caregivers’ needs and emotions, leading to the formation of a secure base for their explorations.

Strengths of Attachment Theory

Bowlby’s Theory of Attachment has several strengths that have contributed to its widespread acceptance and application in various fields.

Universality of Attachment

One of the key strengths of Bowlby’s theory is its universality. Bowlby argued that attachment is a genetic program that is present in all humans, transcending cultural and ethnic differences.

This notion has been supported by numerous studies conducted across different cultures and societies. Regardless of upbringing or cultural norms, children all over the world display similar attachment behaviors and patterns, emphasizing the biological basis of attachment.

Internal Working Model

Another strength of Bowlby’s theory is the concept of an internal working model. This refers to a mental representation or framework that individuals develop based on their early attachment experiences.

This internal working model shapes their expectations and beliefs about human relationships. Individuals with secure attachments in childhood are more likely to form healthy and trusting relationships in adulthood, while those with insecure attachments may struggle with intimacy and trust.

Incredible Impact

Bowlby’s theory has had an incredible impact on various fields, including clinical therapy, educational psychology, child care, and parenting practices. By understanding the importance of early attachment, therapists can help individuals overcome attachment-related issues and traumas.

In educational psychology, knowledge of attachment theory guides educators in creating supportive and nurturing learning environments. Additionally, theories of attachment have informed childcare practices, emphasizing the need for consistent and loving caregiving for optimal child development.


Bowlby’s Theory of Attachment provides valuable insights into the emotional bond between infants and their caregivers. It sheds light on the stages of attachment and highlights the universal nature of this instinctual behavior.

The theory’s strengths, such as the concept of an internal working model, have had a profound impact on various fields. By understanding the importance of attachment, we can better support the healthy development of children and promote nurturing relationships.

Criticisms of Attachment Theory

While Bowlby’s Theory of Attachment has gained widespread acceptance and has been immensely influential in understanding the emotional bond between infants and caregivers, it is not without its criticisms. This section will explore some of the main criticisms surrounding attachment theory.

Uncertainty about the ‘Critical Period’

One prominent criticism of attachment theory is the uncertainty surrounding the notion of a ‘critical period’ for attachment formation. Bowlby initially proposed that the first two years of a child’s life are crucial for the development of a secure attachment.

He argued that prolonged maternal deprivation during this period could lead to serious consequences, such as the development of a dysfunctional personality. However, subsequent research has questioned this concept of a specific time frame for attachment formation.

While early experiences undoubtedly play a significant role in shaping attachment styles, there is evidence to suggest that attachment can form later in life and can be influenced by various factors. Exceptions to the critical period, such as successful adoptions or the formation of secure attachments in later years, challenge the idea that attachment formation is strictly limited to the first few years of life.

Role of the Father is Ignored

Another criticism of attachment theory is its initial neglect of the role of fathers as primary caregivers. Bowlby’s theory focused primarily on the mother-child bond and the notion of maternal deprivation.

However, research has shown that fathers can also play a crucial role in the development of secure attachments. In fact, studies have found that children can form equally strong attachments to their fathers and that the quality of the father-child relationship has significant implications for a child’s emotional and social development.

Attachment theories that fail to acknowledge the importance of the father’s role may overlook the diverse caregiving dynamics that exist within families. Recognizing the unique contributions of both parents in attachment formation can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the factors that shape a child’s attachment style.

Overemphasis on Infant Temperament

Critics argue that attachment theory places an overemphasis on infant temperament as a determining factor in attachment style. Attachment theory suggests that a child’s temperament influences the type of attachment they develop with their primary caregiver.

However, research has shown that other variables, such as the sensitivity and responsiveness of the caregiver, also significantly impact attachment outcomes. While temperament certainly plays a role, it is important to acknowledge that a child’s attachment style is not solely determined by their inherent traits.

The quality of the caregiver’s interactions and the environmental factors in which the child is raised also shape the attachment relationship. Therefore, an overemphasis on infant temperament may oversimplify the complex interactions that contribute to attachment formation.


In conclusion, while Bowlby’s Theory of Attachment has made significant contributions to our understanding of the emotional bond between infants and their caregivers, it is not free from criticism. The concept of a ‘critical period’ for attachment formation has faced doubts regarding its strict time frame and exceptions to its predictions.

Additionally, the original theory’s negligence of the father’s role and its overemphasis on infant temperament have also received criticism. Despite these criticisms, attachment theory remains a valuable framework for understanding the formation of emotional bonds, even if some aspects may require further exploration and refinement.

By considering the diverse factors that shape attachment styles, including the role of fathers and the complex interactions between caregiver and child, we can enhance our understanding of the significance of early bonding experiences and their impact on human relationships.

Popular Posts